Question
In Young’s double-slit experiment, the slit separation is mm and the screen is m away. Light of wavelength nm is used. (a) Find the fringe width. (b) If the entire setup is immersed in water (), what is the new fringe width? (c) What happens to the fringe pattern if we cover one slit?
Solution — Step by Step
The fringe width formula is
m mm.
Inside water, the wavelength shortens to . So
With one slit blocked, there is no two-source interference. We get single-slit diffraction instead — a broad central bright band with much weaker side fringes. The crisp equally-spaced YDSE pattern disappears.
Final answers: (a) mm, (b) mm, (c) pattern becomes single-slit diffraction.
Why This Works
Fringe width depends on wavelength because the path-difference condition for the next maximum requires an extra of path. A larger pushes that condition to a larger angle from the centre, hence a wider fringe.
When we put the apparatus in water, the frequency of light is unchanged (set by the source) but the speed drops by a factor . Wavelength being speed/frequency, — so fringes shrink.
Alternative Method
Use the path-difference geometry. For the -th bright fringe, . Small-angle gives , so position . Fringe width is . Same formula, derived from first principles.
A frequent NEET trap: students write in water, multiplying instead of dividing. Always remember — wavelength shrinks in a denser medium, so fringes shrink too.
Common Mistake
Confusing single-slit diffraction with double-slit interference. Diffraction gives unequal fringe widths and a much wider central maximum. Interference (with two slits) gives equally spaced bright/dark bands. Examiners deliberately mix these up.