Resolving forces — component method for 2D and 3D equilibrium problems

medium CBSE JEE-MAIN NEET 3 min read

Question

Three forces act on a particle: F1=10\vec{F}_1 = 10 N at 30°30° from the x-axis, F2=8\vec{F}_2 = 8 N along the negative x-axis, and F3=6\vec{F}_3 = 6 N along the positive y-axis. Find the net force magnitude and direction. Is the particle in equilibrium?

(JEE Main & CBSE 11 pattern)


Solution — Step by Step

This is the core technique: replace every angled force with its horizontal and vertical parts.

F1x=10cos30°=10×32=538.66F_{1x} = 10\cos 30° = 10 \times \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} = 5\sqrt{3} \approx 8.66 N

F1y=10sin30°=10×12=5F_{1y} = 10\sin 30° = 10 \times \frac{1}{2} = 5 N

F2x=8F_{2x} = -8 N (negative x-direction), F2y=0F_{2y} = 0

F3x=0F_{3x} = 0, F3y=6F_{3y} = 6 N

ΣFx=53+(8)+0=5380.66 N\Sigma F_x = 5\sqrt{3} + (-8) + 0 = 5\sqrt{3} - 8 \approx 0.66 \text{ N} ΣFy=5+0+6=11 N\Sigma F_y = 5 + 0 + 6 = 11 \text{ N} Fnet=(ΣFx)2+(ΣFy)2=(0.66)2+(11)20.44+12111.02 NF_{\text{net}} = \sqrt{(\Sigma F_x)^2 + (\Sigma F_y)^2} = \sqrt{(0.66)^2 + (11)^2} \approx \sqrt{0.44 + 121} \approx \mathbf{11.02 \text{ N}}

Direction: α=tan1(ΣFyΣFx)=tan1(110.66)86.6°\alpha = \tan^{-1}\left(\dfrac{\Sigma F_y}{\Sigma F_x}\right) = \tan^{-1}\left(\dfrac{11}{0.66}\right) \approx \mathbf{86.6°} from x-axis.

For equilibrium, we need ΣFx=0\Sigma F_x = 0 AND ΣFy=0\Sigma F_y = 0. Since both are non-zero, the particle is not in equilibrium — it will accelerate in the direction of the net force.


Why This Works

Forces are vectors. You cannot simply add their magnitudes — 10+8+610 + 8 + 6 \neq net force. By resolving into perpendicular components, we convert vector addition into simple scalar addition along each axis. Then Pythagoras gives us the magnitude of the resultant.

This method works for any number of forces at any angles. It scales to 3D by adding a z-component.

graph TD
    A["Multiple forces at various angles"] --> B["Resolve each into x, y components"]
    B --> C["Sum all x-components: ΣFx"]
    B --> D["Sum all y-components: ΣFy"]
    C --> E["F_net = √(ΣFx² + ΣFy²)"]
    D --> E
    E --> F{"ΣFx = 0 AND ΣFy = 0?"}
    F -->|"Yes"| G["Equilibrium"]
    F -->|"No"| H["Acceleration = F_net / m"]

Alternative Method — Triangle or Polygon Law

For 2-3 forces, you can draw them head-to-tail and use the triangle law. The closing side gives the resultant. But this is graphical — it’s less accurate and slower for numerical answers. The component method is always preferred in exams.

For equilibrium problems in JEE: if three forces are in equilibrium, use Lami’s theorem: F1sinα1=F2sinα2=F3sinα3\dfrac{F_1}{\sin\alpha_1} = \dfrac{F_2}{\sin\alpha_2} = \dfrac{F_3}{\sin\alpha_3}, where αi\alpha_i is the angle opposite to force FiF_i. This is faster than resolving components when angles between forces are given directly.


Common Mistake

When resolving forces on an inclined plane, students often resolve along horizontal and vertical instead of along and perpendicular to the incline. On an incline at angle θ\theta: resolve mgmg into mgsinθmg\sin\theta (along the plane) and mgcosθmg\cos\theta (normal to the plane). Using the wrong axes makes the equations much harder and introduces unnecessary coupling between the two directions.

Want to master this topic?

Read the complete guide with more examples and exam tips.

Go to full topic guide →

Try These Next