Five resistors in Wheatstone bridge — find current through galvanometer

hard 6 min read

Question

In a Wheatstone bridge, P=10 ΩP = 10\ \Omega, Q=15 ΩQ = 15\ \Omega, R=6 ΩR = 6\ \Omega, and S=10 ΩS = 10\ \Omega. A galvanometer of resistance G=20 ΩG = 20\ \Omega is connected across BD. A battery of emf 6 V is connected across AC. Find the current through the galvanometer.


Solution — Step by Step

The Wheatstone bridge is balanced when:

PQ=RS\frac{P}{Q} = \frac{R}{S}

Check: PQ=1015=23\frac{P}{Q} = \frac{10}{15} = \frac{2}{3} and RS=610=35\frac{R}{S} = \frac{6}{10} = \frac{3}{5}

Since 2335\frac{2}{3} \neq \frac{3}{5}, the bridge is unbalanced. Current flows through the galvanometer.

We must solve using Kirchhoff’s laws.

The Wheatstone bridge circuit:

  • Battery connected between A (positive) and C (negative)
  • P is between A and B; Q is between B and C
  • R is between A and D; S is between D and C
  • Galvanometer G is between B and D

Assign currents:

  • I1I_1 through P (A→B)
  • I2I_2 through R (A→D)
  • IgI_g through G (B→D, assuming B is at higher potential)
  • I1IgI_1 - I_g through Q (B→C)
  • I2+IgI_2 + I_g through S (D→C)

Total current: I=I1+I2I = I_1 + I_2 (from battery)

Loop ABD (A → B via P, then B → D via G):

I1P+IgGI2R=0I_1 P + I_g G - I_2 R = 0 10I1+20Ig6I2=0(1)10I_1 + 20I_g - 6I_2 = 0 \quad \ldots (1)

Loop BDC (B → D via G, then D → C via S, and B → C via Q):

(I1Ig)Q(I2+Ig)SIgG=0(I_1 - I_g)Q - (I_2 + I_g)S - I_g G = 0

Wait — let me re-apply KVL carefully for loop BDCB (going around the inner loop):

Starting at B: go B→D via G: drop IgGI_g \cdot G; go D→C via S: drop (I2+Ig)S(I_2 + I_g)S; go C→B via Q (reversed — going against current): gain (I1Ig)Q(I_1 - I_g)Q.

IgG(I2+Ig)S+(I1Ig)Q=0-I_g G - (I_2 + I_g)S + (I_1 - I_g)Q = 0 20Ig10(I2+Ig)+15(I1Ig)=0-20I_g - 10(I_2 + I_g) + 15(I_1 - I_g) = 0 15I110I245Ig=015I_1 - 10I_2 - 45I_g = 0 3I12I29Ig=0(2)3I_1 - 2I_2 - 9I_g = 0 \quad \ldots (2)

Outer loop (A→B via P → B→C via Q → C to A via battery):

ε=I1P+(I1Ig)Q\varepsilon = I_1 P + (I_1 - I_g) Q 6=10I1+15(I1Ig)6 = 10I_1 + 15(I_1 - I_g) 6=25I115Ig(3)6 = 25I_1 - 15I_g \quad \ldots (3)

From equations (1), (2), (3):

From (1): 10I16I2=20Ig    5I13I2=10Ig(1)10I_1 - 6I_2 = -20I_g \implies 5I_1 - 3I_2 = -10I_g \quad (1')

From (2): 3I12I2=9Ig(2)3I_1 - 2I_2 = 9I_g \quad (2)

Multiply (2) by 1.5: 4.5I13I2=13.5Ig(2)4.5I_1 - 3I_2 = 13.5I_g \quad (2')

Subtract (1’) from (2’): (4.55)I1=13.5Ig+10Ig=23.5Ig(4.5 - 5)I_1 = 13.5I_g + 10I_g = 23.5I_g

0.5I1=23.5Ig    I1=47Ig-0.5I_1 = 23.5I_g \implies I_1 = -47I_g

Hmm, let me redo this more carefully. I’ll use I1I_1 and I2I_2 from equation (3) and substitute.

From (3): 25I115Ig=6    I1=6+15Ig25(3)25I_1 - 15I_g = 6 \implies I_1 = \frac{6 + 15I_g}{25} \quad (3')

We need another relation. Use the outer loop through R and S:

ε=I2R+(I2+Ig)S=6I2+10(I2+Ig)=16I2+10Ig\varepsilon = I_2 R + (I_2 + I_g)S = 6I_2 + 10(I_2 + I_g) = 16I_2 + 10I_g 6=16I2+10Ig    I2=610Ig16(4)6 = 16I_2 + 10I_g \implies I_2 = \frac{6 - 10I_g}{16} \quad (4)

Substitute (3’) and (4) into (1):

106+15Ig25+20Ig6610Ig16=010 \cdot \frac{6 + 15I_g}{25} + 20I_g - 6 \cdot \frac{6 - 10I_g}{16} = 0 2(6+15Ig)5+20Ig3(610Ig)8=0\frac{2(6 + 15I_g)}{5} + 20I_g - \frac{3(6 - 10I_g)}{8} = 0

Multiply through by 40 (LCM of 5 and 8):

16(6+15Ig)+800Ig15(610Ig)=016(6 + 15I_g) + 800I_g - 15(6 - 10I_g) = 0 96+240Ig+800Ig90+150Ig=096 + 240I_g + 800I_g - 90 + 150I_g = 0 6+1190Ig=06 + 1190I_g = 0 Ig=61190=35950.00504 AI_g = -\frac{6}{1190} = -\frac{3}{595} \approx -0.00504 \text{ A}

The negative sign means current flows from D→B (opposite to assumed direction). Magnitude:

Ig=35955.04×103 A5 mA|I_g| = \frac{3}{595} \approx 5.04 \times 10^{-3} \text{ A} \approx 5 \text{ mA}

Why This Works

Kirchhoff’s laws encode the two fundamental conservation laws:

  • KCL (junction rule): Conservation of charge — current in = current out at every node
  • KVL (loop rule): Conservation of energy — sum of potential differences around any loop = 0

For a Wheatstone bridge, the balanced condition (P/Q=R/SP/Q = R/S) is a special case where Ig=0I_g = 0 — derived by setting the potential at B and D equal. When this ratio doesn’t hold, we must use the full Kirchhoff analysis.


Alternative Method — Thevenin’s Theorem

For an unbalanced Wheatstone bridge, Thevenin’s theorem is often faster:

  1. Remove the galvanometer
  2. Find the open-circuit voltage VBDV_{BD} (Thevenin voltage)
  3. Find the equivalent resistance RthR_{th} between B and D (with battery replaced by wire)
  4. Current: Ig=VBDRth+GI_g = \frac{V_{BD}}{R_{th} + G}

VBD=VBVD=I1PI2RV_{BD} = V_B - V_D = I_1 P - I_2 R (with galvanometer removed, I1=6P+Q=625=0.24I_1 = \frac{6}{P+Q} = \frac{6}{25} = 0.24 A, I2=6R+S=616=0.375I_2 = \frac{6}{R+S} = \frac{6}{16} = 0.375 A)

VBD=0.24×100.375×6=2.42.25=0.15V_{BD} = 0.24 \times 10 - 0.375 \times 6 = 2.4 - 2.25 = 0.15 V

Rth=PQP+Q+RSR+S=10×1525+6×1016=6+3.75=9.75 ΩR_{th} = \frac{PQ}{P+Q} + \frac{RS}{R+S} = \frac{10 \times 15}{25} + \frac{6 \times 10}{16} = 6 + 3.75 = 9.75\ \Omega

Ig=0.159.75+20=0.1529.755.04×103I_g = \frac{0.15}{9.75 + 20} = \frac{0.15}{29.75} \approx 5.04 \times 10^{-3} A ✓

Thevenin’s theorem is significantly faster for Wheatstone bridge problems. JEE Main prefers Kirchhoff’s for shown working, but Thevenin gives the same answer in fewer steps. Learn both — Thevenin for quick MCQ checks, Kirchhoff for long-answer proofs.


Common Mistake

Students often assume a Wheatstone bridge is balanced and set Ig=0I_g = 0 without checking the balance condition first. Always check P/Q=R/SP/Q = R/S before concluding the bridge is balanced. Here, 10/156/1010/15 \neq 6/10, so Ig0I_g \neq 0. Treating an unbalanced bridge as balanced gives completely wrong answers.

Want to master this topic?

Read the complete guide with more examples and exam tips.

Go to full topic guide →

Try These Next