Vectors: Conceptual Doubts Cleared (12)

hard 3 min read

Question

If a,b,c\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c} are three non-coplanar vectors, prove that [a+b,b+c,c+a]=2[a,b,c][\vec{a} + \vec{b}, \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{c} + \vec{a}] = 2[\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}], where [,,][\cdot, \cdot, \cdot] denotes the scalar triple product.

Solution — Step by Step

[a+b,b+c,c+a][\vec{a}+\vec{b}, \vec{b}+\vec{c}, \vec{c}+\vec{a}] means (a+b)[(b+c)×(c+a)](\vec{a}+\vec{b}) \cdot [(\vec{b}+\vec{c}) \times (\vec{c}+\vec{a})].

(b+c)×(c+a)=b×c+b×a+c×c+c×a(\vec{b}+\vec{c}) \times (\vec{c}+\vec{a}) = \vec{b} \times \vec{c} + \vec{b} \times \vec{a} + \vec{c} \times \vec{c} + \vec{c} \times \vec{a}

Since c×c=0\vec{c} \times \vec{c} = 0 and b×a=a×b\vec{b} \times \vec{a} = -\vec{a} \times \vec{b}:

=b×ca×b+c×a= \vec{b} \times \vec{c} - \vec{a} \times \vec{b} + \vec{c} \times \vec{a}.

(a+b)(b×ca×b+c×a)(\vec{a}+\vec{b}) \cdot (\vec{b} \times \vec{c} - \vec{a} \times \vec{b} + \vec{c} \times \vec{a}).

Distribute and use the cyclic property a(b×c)=[a,b,c]\vec{a} \cdot (\vec{b} \times \vec{c}) = [\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}] and a(a×b)=0\vec{a} \cdot (\vec{a} \times \vec{b}) = 0 (any triple product with a repeated vector is zero).

Non-zero terms: a(b×c)=[a,b,c]\vec{a} \cdot (\vec{b} \times \vec{c}) = [\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}] and b(c×a)=[b,c,a]=[a,b,c]\vec{b} \cdot (\vec{c} \times \vec{a}) = [\vec{b},\vec{c},\vec{a}] = [\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}] (cyclic).

So total = [a,b,c]+[a,b,c]=2[a,b,c][\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}] + [\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}] = 2[\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}].

Final answer: proved.

Why This Works

The scalar triple product is a determinant. When you replace each vector by a sum, you can split the determinant by linearity in each row — this gives 23=82^3 = 8 smaller determinants. Most of them vanish because two rows become equal (the determinant of a matrix with two equal rows is zero). Only two non-zero terms survive, both equal to [a,b,c][\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}], giving the factor 2.

This is a JEE Advanced classic — the geometric interpretation is that the parallelepiped formed by a+b,b+c,c+a\vec{a}+\vec{b}, \vec{b}+\vec{c}, \vec{c}+\vec{a} has exactly twice the volume of the parallelepiped formed by a,b,c\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}.

Alternative Method

Use determinants. Write each new vector as a linear combination, get the matrix:

M=(110011101)M = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}

(coefficients of a,b,c\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c} in each new vector). Compute detM=2\det M = 2. Then the new triple product = detM\det M times the old triple product.

For any linear combination of three vectors, the new triple product = (determinant of coefficient matrix) × (old triple product). Memorise this; it generalises far beyond this one example.

Common Mistake

Trying to expand all 8 terms term by term and getting lost. Use the linearity-of-determinants shortcut and you save 80% of the algebra.

Forgetting the cyclic property of triple products. [a,b,c]=[b,c,a]=[c,a,b][\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}] = [\vec{b},\vec{c},\vec{a}] = [\vec{c},\vec{a},\vec{b}], but [a,c,b]=[a,b,c][\vec{a},\vec{c},\vec{b}] = -[\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}] (swap two vectors → flip sign).

Want to master this topic?

Read the complete guide with more examples and exam tips.

Go to full topic guide →

Try These Next