Let A=(1324). Find A−1, verify by computing A⋅A−1, and use it to solve the system x+2y=5, 3x+4y=11. Finally, explain why this method fails for some matrices and how to recognise that case.
The matrix-inverse method turns a linear system into a product. When A is invertible (i.e., detA=0), there’s a unique solution x=A−1b. This is the cleanest way to solve 2×2 and 3×3 systems for board exams.
The method fails when detA=0 — the matrix is singular, no inverse exists. Geometrically, the two equations represent either parallel lines (no solution) or the same line (infinite solutions). You must then use elimination or Cramer’s rule with care.
Alternative Method
Cramer’s rule:
x=detAdetAx,y=detAdetAy
where Ax replaces column 1 with b and Ay replaces column 2.
detAx=51124=20−22=−2⟹x=−2/−2=1
detAy=13511=11−15=−4⟹y=−4/−2=2
Same answer.
For 2×2 systems, Cramer’s rule is often the fastest manual method — fewer arithmetic steps than the inverse method. For 3×3 and beyond, the inverse method becomes competitive because you can pre-compute A−1 once and reuse it.
Common Mistake
Three classic errors:
Sign error in the cofactor matrix. The 2×2 inverse formula swaps diagonals and negates the off-diagonals. Many students forget the negation and write (dcba) instead of (d−c−ba).
Forgetting to divide by detA. The cofactor matrix gives the adjugate, not the inverse. Always multiply by 1/detA.
Trying to invert a singular matrix. If detA=0, the system has no unique solution. Don’t attempt A−1 — switch to elimination and analyse the rank.
Final answer:A−1=(−23/21−1/2), x=1, y=2.
Want to master this topic?
Read the complete guide with more examples and exam tips.