Question
Distinguish between physical adsorption (physisorption) and chemical adsorption (chemisorption) using five criteria: nature of forces, enthalpy of adsorption, temperature dependence, specificity, and reversibility. Use this to predict whether the adsorption of on iron in the Haber process is physisorption or chemisorption, and explain.
Solution — Step by Step
| Criterion | Physisorption | Chemisorption |
|---|---|---|
| Nature of forces | van der Waals (weak) | Chemical bond (strong) |
| to | to | |
| Temperature | Decreases with rising | Increases with initially, then decreases |
| Specificity | Non-specific | Highly specific |
| Reversibility | Reversible | Often irreversible |
The Haber process operates at — high temperature. Physisorption would decrease with rising , so N₂ wouldn’t stick. The fact that adsorption occurs at high rules out physisorption.
Also, N₂ on Fe shows specificity: not every metal catalyses the reaction. Only Fe (and a few others like Ru) work well. Specificity is a chemisorption hallmark.
Conclusion: N₂ on Fe in the Haber process is chemisorption.
Chemisorption breaks the strong triple bond by adsorbing onto Fe and forming weaker Fe-N bonds. These weaker bonds are easier to break in the next step (reaction with on the surface). This is the whole point of a heterogeneous catalyst — it lowers activation energy by making chemisorbed intermediates.
Why This Works
Adsorption is the accumulation of molecules on a surface. The strength of the molecule-surface interaction determines whether it’s physisorption (cold-trap-style sticking by weak forces) or chemisorption (a real chemical bond forms). The five criteria are interconnected: stronger forces larger more specific binding harder to reverse.
For NEET, the key application is heterogeneous catalysis — every industrial catalyst (Haber, Ostwald, contact process) involves chemisorption of reactants onto the catalyst surface.
Alternative Method
You can identify the type by enthalpy values alone if given. is typical of physisorption; unmistakably chemisorption. NEET often hands you the enthalpy and expects you to classify in one step.
A clean memory aid: physisorption is like a snug hug, chemisorption is like a marriage. Hugs are easy to break (reversible), can stack up (multilayer), and don’t depend on who you are (non-specific). Marriages bind tight (high ), are usually one-on-one (monolayer), and are person-specific.
Common Mistake
Two traps NEET sets repeatedly:
-
Temperature dependence of chemisorption. It’s not monotonic. At low , raising helps overcome the activation energy for bond formation, so adsorption increases. Beyond an optimum, the Maxwell-Boltzmann tail starts overcoming the binding energy and adsorption falls. Many students simplify to “chemisorption increases with ” — wrong above the optimum.
-
Calling all gas-on-metal adsorption physisorption. It depends on the gas/metal pair and conditions. Noble gases on metals at low → physisorption. Reactive gases (, , ) on transition metals at high → chemisorption.
Final answer: Five criteria distinguish physisorption (weak, non-specific, reversible) from chemisorption (strong, specific, often irreversible). on Fe in the Haber process is chemisorption — operates at high , is specific to Fe, and forms surface Fe-N bonds.