Question
A solid catalyst adsorbs mol of nitrogen per gram of catalyst at K and atm pressure. The Freundlich isotherm is found to give and . Verify the data and predict the adsorption at atm.
Solution — Step by Step
Freundlich: mol/g.
Observed: mol/g. Ratio — minor discrepancy, possibly due to multilayer or measurement error.
If the observed atm value is times the Freundlich prediction, applying the same scaling: mol/g.
. Plot vs — slope should be , intercept . The data point at atm: ; intercept off by , consistent with the small discrepancy noted.
Final answer: predicted adsorption at atm mol/g (pure Freundlich) or mol/g if scaling for the atm offset.
Why This Works
Freundlich’s isotherm is empirical: . Useful at moderate pressures. At very low pressures, Henry’s law () is more accurate. At very high pressures, saturates (Langmuir limit), and Freundlich overestimates.
The "" power encodes diminishing returns: doubling pressure does not double adsorption.
Alternative Method
Use Langmuir’s isotherm . For low this reduces to (linear). For high it saturates at . JEE Advanced sometimes asks you to choose between models — Freundlich for the linear log-log range, Langmuir when saturation is hinted.
Students compute as . The Freundlich exponent is , applied as a power, not a divisor. For : , not (lucky coincidence here!). Try : , not .
NEET 2023 had a Freundlich problem testing the log-log linear form. Knowing that gives a straight line is worth the chapter.